I know Firefly fans made a big deal about it when that show aired and praised the lack of sound. As for sound in space, that sort of goes with the 4th wall thing, after all, how are we seeing the images at all, it's not like there would really be cameras in space either. With 2001, it's like an event when you watch it. I find it easier to watch with less mystery and ominous imagery. _Ģ010 had some rather large shoes to fill, but I sort of like it. The info on CX noise reduction also explains the mess Pioneer made of CX encoding, which was basically duplicated with Digital sound LaserDisc's. have murdered the other crew members and then claim to be looking for the real killer?Īs a bit of self promotion, my LaserVision Landmarks site has much more info added, especially in the catalogs section - and in the technical player section, new brochures have been added and the CLD-900 brochure gives a nice explanation of how PCM sound was added to LaserDisc. I wonder, had the mission to Mars gone as originally planned, would O.J. The 70mm prints and 6-track sound were amazing though. And when Hyams delivered 2010, MGM was shocked that he delivered. There is a book about MGM from the mid-80's and it details the degree of control Peter Hyams had and how he was treated as a superstar by MGM during the making of 2010, since they thought 2010 would revive their sagging fortunes. I loved Candice Bergan's voice as SAL 9000 - but what did SAL stand for since HAL stood for the way the computer worked - Heuristically programmed ALgorighmic computer. One thing I hated about 2010 was that 2001 had no sound in space, but 2010 was full of sound in the vacuum of space. Gonna just go back and re-read those books for good times sake !!! No secret, you can not include all a novel's storyline for big screen production however with this movie it was extremely lacking.Īll considered though, I did like some aspects of this production on the big screen.Īlso viewed this at the movies as a youngster and was inspired by the sights during the space walks between Discovery and Sakhrov drive enabled ship the Leonov. Clarke fan I found 2010 (the movie) to be a bit of a let down. I did not realize the same director did 2010.Įxplains a great deal about both films in hindsight.īeing a huge Arthur C. A new stereo mix was created, optimized for conventional and Dolby Pro Logic systems." We created discrete surrounds and added a subwoofer channel for impact. Using a proprietary process the 1125 line signal was downconverted to 525 line NTSC video, dramatically increasing resolution and colour fidelity while minimizing video artifacts such as moire and twiter."ĭolby Digital AC-3 Discrete Six Track Surround: "For this laserdisc release we located the original dialogue, stereo music, effects and surround tracks. Superscan Hi-Definition Downconversion Transfer: "Capricorn One was transferred on a High Definition Rank Mark III. Special Edition Features (from the back cover): Not sure if there's any difference with the 2008 DVD, my guess is it's just a reissue. No release date on a Blu ray, the LD from '97 has a six track DD, likely the same as the '98 DVD which is also 384 kb/s which is what I have. The ending sort of leaves me wondering, which I assume is director's intent, but I like to see how things turned how, that's just me. I'd say the Oscar goes to Frank Tallman for a helleva good job stunt flying. The Running Man ending (trying to remember how many 70's movies I've seen now with slow-motion running at the ending of a movie: The Signal, kind of makes you feel sick to your stomach when you see it, but the government was all in at this point:Īwesome stunt flying, feels like you can reach out and touch the canyon walls: I thought the 5.1 on the DVD as pretty decent. Very good footage of flying close to the walls in canyon. The best part is the ending, with Stearman plane chase. I had never seen it until about a year ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |